ArticleBMC oral health2025
Treatment patterns and clinical interventions in pediatric dental emergencies during COVID-19.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of AI-powered patient management systems in dental clinics.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile COVID-19’s impact on dental services has been widely studied, limited research exists on how the pandemic altered clinical decision-making and treatment selection in pediatric dental emergencies. This study examined changes in treatment patterns and clinical interventions for pediatric dental emergencies during the COVID-19 lockdown, aiming to understand how crisis conditions influence clinical approaches and treatment outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 6,024 emergency dental visits of children under 12 years across three distinct periods: pre-COVID (March-May 2019), during first lockdown (March-May 2020), and post-lockdown (March-May 2021). Data were collected from electronic dental records of a major Israeli healthcare provider operating 50 dental clinics. Treatment categories were classified as conservative (medication only, temporary restorations) or invasive (extractions, pulp therapy). Statistical analysis included chi-square tests for treatment distribution comparisons and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate factors influencing treatment selection, adjusting for age, sex, and presenting conditions.
resultsDuring lockdown, invasive treatments increased significantly, with extraction rates rising from 18.4 to 24.8% and pulp therapy from 12.2 to 15.6% (p < 0.001). Pharmaceutical-only interventions decreased from 44.6 to 22.4%. Multivariate analysis revealed higher odds of receiving invasive treatment during lockdown (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.54–2.15) compared to pre-COVID period, even after adjusting for presenting conditions. The trend toward invasive treatments persisted but moderated in the post-lockdown period, with rates returning closer to pre-pandemic levels (19.2% for extractions, 11.8% for pulp therapy). Treatment planning showed a significant shift from conservative to invasive interventions during lockdown, with conservative treatments (pharmaceutical management, temporary and permanent restorations) decreasing from 89.6 to 56.1%, while invasive treatments (pulp therapy, extractions, drainage) increased correspondingly.
conclusionsThe pandemic crisis was associated with shifts in treatment patterns, favoring definitive interventions over temporary solutions. This change in clinical decision-making patterns suggests a crisis-induced adaptation in treatment planning, potentially influenced by uncertainty about future care accessibility. These findings provide important insights for developing clinical guidelines for pediatric dental emergency care during future healthcare crises. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.