ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Understanding the profile of community health workers in breast cancer screening education: women's preferences and insights from a qualitative focus group study.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applying multi-theory model to determine intentions to breast self-awareness among female health workers in Kabul, Afghanistan.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite efforts to reduce disparities in breast cancer screening uptake in Flanders, certain population groups, such as women with a lower income, a lower educational attainment, women living further from screening units, and with a migration background, remain less likely to participate in the population-based mammography screening program. Community Health Workers (CHWs) are effectively involved in breast cancer screening programs in various countries to reach underserved women. In Flanders, Belgium, the involvement of CHWs in breast cancer screening programs is relatively recent. However, little is known about the preferences of the target population regarding the potential profile of a CHW in breast cancer screening education in Flanders. This study aims to explore this gap.
methodsFour focus group discussions were conducted between August and December 2023. Data were analysed using Qualitative Content Analysis to identify key categories, which were subsequently organized according to Kok et al.’s framework of CHW performance.
resultsThe results emphasize the importance of the desired competencies of CHWs, including professional knowledge and expertise, personal experience in shaping competencies, effective communication skills, cultural awareness and motivational and supportive competencies. Empathy, sociability, and adaptability were identified as key attitudes for fostering trust and creating supportive relationships. Trust emerged as a central theme, where female CHWs were preferred for their ability to enhance safety and trust, especially when they had prior experience with breast cancer screening.
conclusionThe findings of this study provide actionable insights regarding the profile of CHWs involved in breast cancer screening education, underscoring the need for a balanced combination of attributes to address the specific preferences of the target population. By integrating the target populations’ perspectives, this research bridges gaps in existing CHW performance frameworks, offering a more comprehensive understanding of CHW performance. Recruiting CHWs with the right combination of competencies, interpersonal skills and attitudes is critical for the success of breast cancer education programs. Further research is needed to explore these findings in other contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.