ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
The impact of surgeons' experience and practice on postoperative cervical collar use after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a cross-sectional survey in Heilongjiang province, China.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal quantitative ultrasound assessment of perioperative neck muscle alterations in patients with cervical spondylosis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Early efficacy and safety of spinal endoscopy assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the preferences of spine surgeons in Heilongjiang Province regarding the duration of cervical collar use after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and to identify the factors influencing these preferences.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in Heilongjiang Province from August 4 to August 11, 2024. A convenience sampling method was employed to survey 96 spine surgeons via an online questionnaire. Factors influencing the duration of cervical collar use were analysed via chi-square tests and binary logistic regression.
resultsSignificant variation in the duration of cervical collar use was observed after single-level ACDF, with the shortest duration being no use (2.08%) and the longest being 12 weeks (4.17%). The most common duration was 3 weeks (65.63%). The factors influencing the duration of cervical collar use included the surgeon’s education level (χ²=10.902, P < 0.001), years of practice (χ²=12.565, P = 0.006), and annual case volume of single-level ACDF (χ²=9.438, P = 0.009). Notably, years of practice was identified as an independent factor influencing the duration of cervical collar use (OR = 0.572, 95% CI: 0.348~0.939; P = 0.027).
conclusionsThis survey shows that there are differences in the clinical practices of spine surgeons in Heilongjiang Province regarding the duration of cervical collar wearing after single-level ACDF. These research findings suggest the need to develop standardized guidelines and consensus, alongside improved postoperative health education, to reduce the related complications caused by the long-term use of cervical collars in patients, such as axial symptoms, and to improve patients’ quality of life after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.