ArticleBMC women's health2025
Hemorrhagic ascites in endometriosis: a case series and clinical implications.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Endometriosis with hemorrhagic ascites in a perimenopausal woman: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemorrhagic ascites is a rare clinical manifestation of endometriosis, often misdiagnosed due to its resemblance to malignancy. This study aims to highlight diagnostic and management challenges by presenting three cases. CASE PRESENTATION: Three nulliparous women presented with abdominal distension, pelvic pain, and large-volume bloody ascites. One had concurrent right-sided hemorrhagic pleural effusions. Imaging studies showed deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) without ovarian endometriomas in two patients. Laparoscopic surgery confirmed extensive endometriosis with 2-4 L of bloody ascitic fluid. Histopathological examination excluded malignancy and confirmed endometriosis. Postoperative medical therapy included hormonal suppression.
conclusionBloody ascites is an uncommon but important presentation of severe endometriosis. These cases highlight the importance of considering endometriosis in the differential diagnosis of bloody ascites, particularly in reproductive-aged women. Surgical diagnosis and histopathologic confirmation are essential to rule out malignancy. A multidisciplinary approach and individualized fertility planning are crucial in managing these complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.