ArticleBMC oral health2025
Perspectives and experiences with equitable data collection in oral health: a qualitative investigation.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal Oral Health for Black Women.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough there has been progress in recent years, oral health data collection processes are still generally not inclusive of all people. This phenomenological qualitative study explores equitable oral health data collection in the United States by interviewing individuals often excluded due to race, ethnicity, language, disability, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The purpose of this study is to explore challenges related to equitable data collection in oral health research.
methodsA phenomenological qualitative approach was utilized which included a convenience sample of individuals with varied demographic backgrounds and engaged in population health efforts to improve access to oral health. Focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews were conducted virtually. Thematic analysis was used to explore the data. Rigor and trustworthiness were added through team check-ins, memo writing, audit trail, and member checking.
resultsFocus groups (n = 6 groups; 20 participants) and in-depth interviews (n = 3 participants) were comprised of interview participants. Four common themes were identified: challenges with access to oral health care, accurate identification of study participants, intersection of demographic descriptors, and suggestions for improving equitable data collection.
conclusionOral health data collection processes do not always allow individuals to describe what they perceive as important aspects of their identity. Through this qualitative exploration, study participants shared challenges and provided suggestions for improving oral health data collection that allows for more accurate identification of research participants. Based on these interviews, we recommend oral health researchers provide multiple response options, allow research participants to ‘select all that apply,’ and provide open-ended text boxes for respondents to provide additional detail as needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.