ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Biomechanical effect of cage size in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic posterior cervical canal decompression versus laminoplasty for two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical outcomes and finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Parametric Finite Element Evaluation of Load Redistribution Under Progressive Lumbar Disc Degeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical procedure for treating cervical spine diseases, but its anterior approach can lead to complications such as dysphagia and carotid artery injury due to the large incision. However, performing ACDF under a percutaneous endoscopic approach can effectively mitigate these issues. Considering the need for smaller-sized cages in endoscopic procedures, this study explores the feasibility of using small-sized cages for percutaneous endoscopic ACDF surgery.
methodsThe finite element method is used in this paper to construct cervical spine surgical models with three different sizes of cages implanted, studying the impact of size on cervical biomechanical performance. The dimensions of the cages remain constant in length and height, with a length of 14 mm and a height of 6 mm, and widths of 7 mm, 10 mm, and 14 mm, respectively.
resultsIn a complete fusion state, the range of motion of the surgery level decreased, while adjacent segments showed a compensatory increase in range of motion. Intervertebral disc pressure increased in adjacent discs during flexion and extension. Facet joint pressure in the operated segments generally decreased across all conditions compared to the intact model, but in non-surgical segments exhibited varied compensatory increases under different conditions. Smaller cages led to increased von Mises stress on the cage and endplates, with stress distribution varying by motion condition.
conclusionThe results show that, using a 10 mm wide polyetheretherketone cage in complete fusion does not significantly affect postoperative vertebral stability or adjacent segment degeneration risk. Additionally, the risk of subsidence is relatively low, making it a suitable cage option for percutaneous endoscopic ACDF surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.