Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615947›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Deep learning-based classification of parotid gland tumors: integrating dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.

Kazim Ayberk Sinci, Ilker Ozgur Koska, Yusuf Kenan Cetinoglu, Nezahat Erdogan, Ali Murat Koc, Nuket Ozkavruk Eliyatkin, Cagan Koska, Barkan Candan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kazim Ayberk SinciDepartment of Radiology, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 34303, Türkiye. ayberksinci94@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-5850
Ilker Ozgur KoskaDepartment of Radiology, Behcet Uz Children's Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Yusuf Kenan CetinogluDepartment of Radiology, Behcet Uz Children's Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Nezahat ErdoganDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Ali Murat KocDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Nuket Ozkavruk EliyatkinDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Cagan KoskaDepartment of Electrical Electronical Engineering, Yaşar University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.
Barkan CandanDepartment of Electrical Electronical Engineering, Yaşar University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the performance of deep learning models in classifying parotid gland tumors using T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images, along with DCE data derived from time-intensity curves.

methodsIn this retrospective, single-center study including a total of 164 participants, 124 patients with surgically confirmed parotid gland tumors and 40 individuals with normal parotid glands underwent multiparametric MRI, including DCE sequences. Data partitions were performed at the patient level (80% training, 10% validation, 10% testing). Two deep learning architectures (MobileNetV2 and EfficientNetB0), as well as a combined approach integrating predictions from both models, were fine-tuned using transfer learning to classify (i) normal versus tumor (Task 1), (ii) benign versus malignant tumors (Task 2), and (iii) benign subtypes (Warthin tumor vs. pleomorphic adenoma) (Task 3). For Tasks 2 and 3, DCE-derived metrics were integrated via a support vector machine. Classification performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, with 95% confidence intervals derived via bootstrap resampling.

resultsIn Task 1, EfficientNetB0 achieved the highest accuracy (85%). In Task 2, the combined approach reached an accuracy of 65%, while adding DCE data significantly improved performance, with MobileNetV2 achieving an accuracy of 96%. In Task 3, EfficientNetB0 demonstrated the highest accuracy without DCE data (75%), while including DCE data boosted the combined approach to an accuracy of 89%.

conclusionsAdding DCE-MRI data to deep learning models substantially enhances parotid gland tumor classification accuracy, highlighting the value of functional imaging biomarkers in improving noninvasive diagnostic workflows.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingParotid NeoplasmsAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedParotid GlandRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaDeep learningParotid neoplasmsPerfusion magnetic resonance imagingPleomorphic adenomaWarthin tumor

Identifiers

PMID40615947
PMCPMC12226916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.