ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
Platform trials-an emerging methodology for perioperative medicine: a narrative review.
Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The traditional model for testing new treatments, before widespread usage in clinical practice, is the parallel group randomised trial. However, these are often inefficient, time-consuming and expensive, which can be barriers to the timely improvement of clinical care. This is a particular issue for anaesthesia and perioperative medicine where funding for large clinical trials is often scarce. Platform trials are an emerging methodology for testing new interventions, which offer benefits over the traditional parallel group paradigm. Platform trials have the ability to test multiple interventions at the same time, and to add or remove interventions during the course of the programme without undermining the validity or integrity of the trial findings. They are most often structured around a master protocol, which describes the core methods and research governance processes, with each intervention described in either a sub-section or appendix to the master protocol. The principal benefit to researchers and to research funders is that, unlike the sequential parallel group trial model, platform trials can use the same research infrastructure (e.g. database, standard operating procedures etc.) to answer multiple research questions, which is much more time and cost effective. The benefits of platform trials can be further enhanced with the use of adaptive designs or by sharing control patients, for example, by using a multi-arm multi-stage design. Perioperative medicine, anaesthesia and surgery are ideally placed to benefit from platform trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.