Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615923›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

A PRISMA systematic review through time on predictive musculoskeletal simulations.

Menthy Denayer, Eligia Alfio, María Alejandra Díaz, Massimo Sartori, Friedl De Groote, Kevin De Pauw, Tom Verstraten

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Menthy DenayerRobotics & Multibody Mechanics (R&MM) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Elsene, 1050, Belgium. menthy.denayer@vub.be.
Eligia AlfioHuman Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Elsene, 1050, Belgium.
María Alejandra DíazHuman Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Elsene, 1050, Belgium.
Massimo SartoriDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, 7522 NB, Netherlands.
Friedl De GrooteDepartment of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Kevin De PauwHuman Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Elsene, 1050, Belgium.
Tom VerstratenRobotics & Multibody Mechanics (R&MM) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Elsene, 1050, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S34825N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This PRISMA systematic review covers the literature on predictive, musculoskeletal simulations. First, we define predictive movement for musculoskeletal systems, as the current literature suffers from inconsistent nomenclature. We distinguish two methods of prediction. The first uses neural models, like muscle-reflex-based and central pattern generator models. The second uses optimization, to make up for the lack of a neural model, like optimal control and deep reinforcement learning. For each method, we illustrate the main concepts and report accuracies, simulation times and limitations. Moreover, we identified key works over the past 50 years, which are fundamental for the current state-of-the-art. The majority of works employ optimization. We recognize six classes of cost function terms and note they are often combined using linear combinations. We describe musculoskeletal models, their muscle model, ground contact model and personalization. Similarly, we identify key software like OpenSim and SCONE. Additionally, we provide an overview of simulated movements, pathologies and assistive devices. We emphasize the difference in tracking simulations and prediction, while clarifying the benefits of using experimental data to predict movement. Finally, we call for quantitative validation to establish comprehensive comparisons between methods. To this end, we share a list of works open-sourcing their codes.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansMovementCentral pattern generatorsGaitHumanLocomotionMuscle-reflexesMusculoskeletal simulationsOptimizationPredictiveReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40615923
PMCPMC12228224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.