ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
A PRISMA systematic review through time on predictive musculoskeletal simulations.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Neuromechanical Simulation Explains Gait Biomechanics in Obesity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predictive simulations of postural control: exploring the role of signal noise and neural delays in Parkinson's disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This PRISMA systematic review covers the literature on predictive, musculoskeletal simulations. First, we define predictive movement for musculoskeletal systems, as the current literature suffers from inconsistent nomenclature. We distinguish two methods of prediction. The first uses neural models, like muscle-reflex-based and central pattern generator models. The second uses optimization, to make up for the lack of a neural model, like optimal control and deep reinforcement learning. For each method, we illustrate the main concepts and report accuracies, simulation times and limitations. Moreover, we identified key works over the past 50 years, which are fundamental for the current state-of-the-art. The majority of works employ optimization. We recognize six classes of cost function terms and note they are often combined using linear combinations. We describe musculoskeletal models, their muscle model, ground contact model and personalization. Similarly, we identify key software like OpenSim and SCONE. Additionally, we provide an overview of simulated movements, pathologies and assistive devices. We emphasize the difference in tracking simulations and prediction, while clarifying the benefits of using experimental data to predict movement. Finally, we call for quantitative validation to establish comprehensive comparisons between methods. To this end, we share a list of works open-sourcing their codes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.