ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Progression risk of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SHAP-Explained machine learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review with exploratory meta-analysis of discrimination.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Correction: Progression risk of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SHAP-Explained machine learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an interpretable machine learning model, explained using SHAP, based on imaging features of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis extracted by convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in order to predict the risk of curve progression and identify the most accurate predictive model.
methodsThis study included 233 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from three medical centers. CNNs were used to extract features from full-spine coronal X-ray images taken at three follow-up points for each patient. Imaging and clinical features from center 1 were analyzed using the Boruta algorithm to identify independent predictors. Data from center 1 were divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, while data from centers 2 and 3 were used as external validation sets. Six machine learning models were constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and model performance was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the training, testing, and external validation sets. The SHAP interpreter was used to analyze the most effective model.
resultsThe six models yielded AUCs ranging from 0.565 to 0.989, accuracies from 0.600 to 0.968, sensitivities from 0.625 to 1.0, and specificities from 0.571 to 0.974. The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.896 in the external validation set. SHAP analysis identified the change in the main Cobb angle between the second and first follow-ups [Cobb1(2−1)] as the most important predictor, followed by the main Cobb angle at the second follow-up (Cobb1-2) and the change in the secondary Cobb angle [Cobb2(2−1)].
conclusionThe XGBoost model demonstrated the best predictive performance in the external validation cohort, confirming its preliminary stability and generalizability. SHAP analysis indicated that Cobb1(2−1) was the most important feature for predicting scoliosis progression. This model offers a valuable tool for clinical decision-making by enabling early identification of high-risk patients and supporting early intervention strategies through automated feature extraction and interpretable analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.