ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Carefix hexaxial spatial frame versus Ilizarov circular external fixator in treating high-energy tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salvage of Complex Bimalleolar Ankle Fracture Non-union after Failed Tibiotalocalcaneal and Charnley Arthrodesis using Fibular Strut Grafting and Ilizarov Fixation: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- A retrospective comparative study of intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiography for measuring mounting parameters of the taylor spatial frame in tibial fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Postoperative X-ray and CT measurement of mounting parameter accuracy for hexapod external fixator in treating tibial fractures: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExternal fixation is an effective treatment for high-energy tibial shaft fractures (HETSFs), often with severe soft tissue damage. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary insights into potential differences in clinical outcomes between the Carefix Hexaxial Spatial Frame (CHSF) and the Ilizarov Circular External Fixator (ICEF) in the definitive treatment of HETSFs.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 46 HETSFs patients, treated with CHSF (n = 26) or ICEF (n = 20), in our department from January 2019 to July 2022. The patient characteristics, operation time, radiological union time, external fixation time, final radiological outcomes, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Complications that occurred during the treatment were classified according to Paley, which categorizes complications into three groups: problems, obstacles, and sequelae. The final clinical assessment was conducted using the criteria established by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) during the patients’ last follow-up visit. The mean follow-up time was 17.2 ± 2.8 months (range 12–24 months).
resultsThe CHSF had a significantly shorter operation time (85.9 ± 11.5 min) than the ICEF (95.8 ± 4.2 min) (P < 0.001). Both groups achieved full bone clinical union. Radiological union time was similar: CHSF (24.5 ± 3.2 weeks) vs. ICEF (25.8 ± 3.5 weeks) (P > 0.05). External fixation duration (equivalent to clinical union time) was similar: CHSF (26.0 ± 3.8 weeks) vs. ICEF (26.5 ± 4.1 weeks) (P > 0.05). Translation and angulation in lateral view for the CHSF were all less than those for the ICEF (P < 0.001). Complication rates were comparable: CHSF 57.7%, ICEF 55.0%. No significant difference in ASAMI scores and complication rates was noted between groups at final follow-up (P > 0.05). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
conclusionIn terms of final clinical outcomes, our findings suggest that both CHSF and ICEF may achieve comparable therapeutic effects for HETSFs, with no significant difference in complication rates. CHSF appeared to demonstrate shorter operation times and improved radiological alignment compared to ICEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.