Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615817›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Automated radiographic assessment of lower limb alignment using deep learning in a data-constrained clinical setting.

Luca Häfliger, Andrea Cina, Louis Leuthard, Hannes A Rüdiger, Vincent A Stadelmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca HäfligerDepartment of Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland.
Andrea CinaDepartment of Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland.
Louis LeuthardDepartment of Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hannes A RüdigerDepartment of Hip and Knee Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland.
Vincent A StadelmannDepartment of Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland. vincent.stadelmann@kws.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA model using stacked hourglass neural network modules was developed for automated lower limb alignment measurements in full-leg frontal radiographs. The goal was to assess whether high accuracy could be achieved with training on relatively small datasets, a common constraint in clinical research.

methodsThe model first identifies joints regions of interest (ROIs), then detects anatomical landmarks for alignment measurement within each ROI. 112 bilateral radiographs (216 annotated single-leg images) were used for training and validation, 99 (186 legs) as internal test set, and 25 (49) as external test set. Performance metrics included intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) and mean absolute error (MAE).

resultsThe model achieved excellent agreement (ICCs > 0.9) with manual annotations for all alignment parameters, except for the joint line convergence angle (ICC < 0.5), which also showed poor agreement between human readers (0.73).

conclusionThe proposed approach demonstrates high accuracy and reliability for automated lower limb alignment assessment, offering a robust solution for clinical research with limited annotated datasets.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLower ExtremityRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsLandmark detectionLimited dataLower limb alignmentMachine learningRadiographic assessmentStacked hourglass neural network

Identifiers

PMID40615817
PMCPMC12231685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.