ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Automated radiographic assessment of lower limb alignment using deep learning in a data-constrained clinical setting.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Automatic Model for Circle Detection in X-Ray Imagery: A Case Study on Hip Prosthesis Wear.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA model using stacked hourglass neural network modules was developed for automated lower limb alignment measurements in full-leg frontal radiographs. The goal was to assess whether high accuracy could be achieved with training on relatively small datasets, a common constraint in clinical research.
methodsThe model first identifies joints regions of interest (ROIs), then detects anatomical landmarks for alignment measurement within each ROI. 112 bilateral radiographs (216 annotated single-leg images) were used for training and validation, 99 (186 legs) as internal test set, and 25 (49) as external test set. Performance metrics included intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) and mean absolute error (MAE).
resultsThe model achieved excellent agreement (ICCs > 0.9) with manual annotations for all alignment parameters, except for the joint line convergence angle (ICC < 0.5), which also showed poor agreement between human readers (0.73).
conclusionThe proposed approach demonstrates high accuracy and reliability for automated lower limb alignment assessment, offering a robust solution for clinical research with limited annotated datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.