ReviewJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2025
Impaired Flow: Glymphatic Dysfunction in Ischemic Stroke and the Influence of Sex.
Review in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects and mechanisms of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment in animal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging Along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing glymphatic-associated fluid dynamics in psychiatric disorders: evidence from neuroimaging - a review.Psychoradiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The glymphatic system, essential for the clearance of metabolic waste from the brain, plays a complex role in the context of ischemic stroke (IS), influencing both the acute phase and long-term recovery. Following IS, impairment in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and in the clearance of neurotoxic substances, such as beta-amyloid and tau proteins, is observed. This dysfunction contributes to the accumulation of waste products in the brain parenchyma, increasing the risk of complications such as post-stroke dementia and depression. Several mechanisms are involved in this process, including perivascular space dilation, changes in aquaporin-4 expression and polarization, and the presence of reactive astrogliosis, all of which further compromise glymphatic function. These factors are also directly associated with the development of cerebral edema, a critical complication that exacerbates the severity of IS. Moreover, growing evidence suggests that biological sex may influence the glymphatic system's response to IS. Studies indicate that women may exhibit a more efficient glymphatic response, potentially mediated by hormones such as estrogen, which could offer greater protection against the deleterious effects of cerebral ischemia. However, further research is needed to confirm this hypothesis and to better understand the mechanisms underlying this sex-based difference. This review article aims to compile and critically discuss current evidence regarding the role of the glymphatic system in IS pathophysiology, also highlighting potential sex-related differences and their implications for future therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40615764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.