Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615729›Full record

Observational studyNature cancer2025

Sentinel lymph node biopsy without systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in females with early-stage cervical cancer: final outcome of the SENTIX prospective, single-arm, noninferiority, international trial.

David Cibula, Simone Marnitz, Jiří Jarkovský, Roman Kocián, Pavel Dundr, Jaroslav Klát, Ignacio Zapardiel, Octavio Arencibia, Fabio Landoni, Jiri Presl and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nature cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02494063 (A Prospective Observational Trial on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Early Stage Cervical Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02494063 completednot on this map

A Prospective Observational Trial on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2016 to 2024Enrolled600ConditionsCervical CancerArmsSentinel lymph node biopsy, At least unilateral systematic pelvic lymph node dissection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. De-escalating radical surgery for select FIGO Stage I cervical cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

David CibulaGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. David.cibula@vfn.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-9356
Simone MarnitzRadiation Oncology Vosspalais, Berlin, Germany.
Jiří JarkovskýInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Roman KociánGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel DundrDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav KlátUniversity Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Ignacio ZapardielGynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9175-7767
Octavio ArencibiaUnit Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Universitario Materno Infantil de Canarias, Las Palmas, Spain.
Fabio LandoniUNIMIB-IRCCS-San Gerardo Monza, Monza, Italy.
Jiri PreslDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Francesco RaspagliesiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Michal ZikánDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bulovka University Hospital and Charles University - First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Luc Rcw van LonkhuijzenCenter for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6905-2704
Aureli TorneGynecologic Oncology Unit, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jiří SlámaGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lubos MinarDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marcela OstojichInstitute of Oncology Angel H. Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Radovan PilkaUniversity Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Almerinda Ferreira PetizDepartment of Gynecology, Francisco Gentil Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal.
Anja PetzelEviamed, Outpatient Diagnostic & Surgery Center Berlin - Charlottenburg, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea BurgetováDepartment of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9975-2338
Daniela FischerováGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristyna NemejcovaDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Christhardt KöhlerDepartment of Gynecology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Altona; Department of Gynecology, DRK Klinik Berlin Westend, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky (Czech Health Research Council) 16-31643AAgentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky (Czech Health Research Council) NV19-03-00023Univerzita Karlova v Praze (Charles University) Cooperatio - Maternal and Childhood Care; NeonatologyUniverzita Karlova v Praze (Charles University) PROGRES Q28/LF1Univerzita Karlova v Praze (Charles University) UNCE/24/MED/018Univerzita Karlova v Praze (Charles University) UNCE/MED/008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy with ultrastaging is standard in endometrial and vulvar cancers, whereas systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) remains recommended in cervical cancer. The SENTIX trial prospectively evaluated the safety of SLN biopsy without PLND in early-stage cervical cancer. Female patients, International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IA1/LVSI+ to IB2 disease, were enrolled between 2016 and 2020 across 47 sites in 18 countries. All underwent SLN biopsy followed by hysterectomy/trachelectomy. Patients with undetected, unilateral or intraoperatively metastatic SLNs were excluded from the intention-to-treat cohort. SLNs were assessed by pathological ultrastaging. Of 731 patients enrolled, 594 formed the intention-to-treat cohort. SLN metastases were identified in 82 patients (12%), 56.1% intraoperatively and 43.9% by ultrastaging. At 2 years, the recurrence rate was 6.1% (one-sided 95% CI 7.9%), confirming noninferiority to the 7% reference rate. Two-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 93.3% (95% CI 94.9-91.6) and 97.9% (95% CI 98.9-97.0), respectively. Here we show that SLN biopsy without systematic PLND did not increase the risk of recurrence in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Pathological ultrastaging of SLNs detected about 44% of N1 cases, which would be missed by a standard lymph node assessment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02494063 ).

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPelvisProspective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.