Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615715›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2025

Challenges and perspectives of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumours: insights from gastric cancer.

Jincai Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jincai ZhouInnovation & Research Department, OriCell Therapeutics Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China. zhoujincai@oricell.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3173-1011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant challenge as it is one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide. Due to its complexity characterised by diverse histological subtypes and genetic mutations, its management and treatment remain a substantial challenge. Recent advancements in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have only marginally improved the prognosis for advanced GC, underscoring the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a breakthrough in haematologic malignancies and is now being investigated as a potential treatment for solid tumours. The remarkable efficacy of CAR-T in GC has been demonstrated in both preclinical and clinical studies. Potential biomarkers for GC treatment include CLDN18.2, MSLN, CEA, EpCAM, MUC1, HER2, FOLR1, and NKG2DL. However, applying CAR-T cells directed against GC still faces considerable challenges. Novel CAR designs have the potential to enhance CAR-T cell therapy for GC by facilitating T cell infiltration, enhancing T cell persistence, reducing on-target off-tumour toxicity, improving tolerance to the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), and bolstering interactions with heterogeneous antigens. This review summarises relevant preclinical studies and clinical progress in CAR-T cell therapy for GC, evaluates its therapeutic potential and safety, discusses current challenges, and outlines future directions for clinical translation.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenStomach NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID40615715
PMCPMC12480880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.