Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2025
Primary tumour resection plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone in metastatic breast cancer (JCOG1017, PRIM-BC): a randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Locoregional Treatment in Non-Progressive De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer under Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial (LTMBC).Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Variation in Surgical Management of Stage IV Breast Cancer: Local/Institutional and Regional Geographic Considerations.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Association between primary tumor surgery and survival in patients withTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- The Role of Primary Tumor Resection in De Novo Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Five Decades of Innovation-Tailored Breast Cancer Treatment: 1976-2026.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Differences in drug efficacy and prognosis between primary and metastatic sites for de novo stage IV breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of a phase III trial, JCOG1017.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Observational
- Primary tumour resection in de novo stage IV breast cancer: considerations from the PRIM-BC trial.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- From Feasibility to Individualization: Surgery for Breast Cancer Liver and Lung Metastases.Cancers · 2026Review
- Efficacy and prognostic predictors of primary systemic therapy for de novo Stage IV breast cancer. Exploratory analysis of JCOG1017 PRIM-BC.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Observational
- The association between local therapies and survival among patients with metastatic inflammatory breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based prognostic model forFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral prospective studies have evaluated the benefit of primary tumour resection (PTR) in de novo Stage IV breast cancer (BC) patients, but it remains controversial. We aimed to investigate whether PTR improves the survival of de novo stage IV BC patients.
methodsDe novo stage IV BC patients were enrolled in the first registration and received systemic therapies according to clinical subtypes. Patients without progression after primary systemic therapy for 3 months were randomly assigned 1:1 to systemic therapy alone (arm A) or PTR plus systemic therapy (arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included local relapse-free survival (LRFS).
resultsFive hundred seventy patients were enrolled between May 5, 2011, and May 31, 2018. Of these, 407 were randomised to arm A (N = 205) or arm B (N = 202). The median follow-up time of all randomised patients was 60 months. The difference in OS was not statistically significant (HR 0.86 90% CI 0.69-1.07, one-sided p = 0.13). Median OS was 69 months (arm A) and 75 months (arm B). In the subgroup analysis, PTR was associated with improved OS in pre-menopausal patients, or those with single-organ metastasis. LRFS in arm B was significantly longer than that in arm A (median LRFS 20 vs. 63 months: HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.53, p < 0.0001). There were no treatment-related deaths.
conclusionsPTR did not prolong OS. However, it improved local control and might benefit a subset of patients, such as those with premenopausal status or with single-organ metastasis. It also improved local relapse-free survival (LRFS), which is a clinically meaningful outcome in trials of systemic therapy. CLINICAL
trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000005586); Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180151).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.