Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615712›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2025

Primary tumour resection plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone in metastatic breast cancer (JCOG1017, PRIM-BC): a randomised clinical trial.

Tadahiko Shien, Fumikata Hara, Kenjiro Aogi, Yasuhiro Yanagida, Michiko Tsuneizumi, Naohito Yamamoto, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Akihiko Suto, Kenichi Watanabe, Michiko Harao and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Tadahiko ShienOkayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan. tshien@md.okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-5512
Fumikata HaraCancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenjiro AogiNational Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Yasuhiro YanagidaShizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Michiko TsuneizumiGunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Gunma, Japan.
Naohito YamamotoChiba Prefectural Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsumotoSaitama Prefectural Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Akihiko SutoNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi WatanabeHokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Michiko HaraoJichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Chizuko KanbayashiNiigata Prefectural Cancer Center, Niigata, Japan.
Mitsuya ItohHiroshima City Hiroshima Citizen's Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takayuki KadoyaHiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Keisei AnanKitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shigeto MaedaNagasaki Municipal Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan.
Keita SasakiNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Gakuto OgawaNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigehira SajiFukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Haruhiko FukudaNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroji IwataAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
JCOG Breast Cancer Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral prospective studies have evaluated the benefit of primary tumour resection (PTR) in de novo Stage IV breast cancer (BC) patients, but it remains controversial. We aimed to investigate whether PTR improves the survival of de novo stage IV BC patients.

methodsDe novo stage IV BC patients were enrolled in the first registration and received systemic therapies according to clinical subtypes. Patients without progression after primary systemic therapy for 3 months were randomly assigned 1:1 to systemic therapy alone (arm A) or PTR plus systemic therapy (arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included local relapse-free survival (LRFS).

resultsFive hundred seventy patients were enrolled between May 5, 2011, and May 31, 2018. Of these, 407 were randomised to arm A (N = 205) or arm B (N = 202). The median follow-up time of all randomised patients was 60 months. The difference in OS was not statistically significant (HR 0.86 90% CI 0.69-1.07, one-sided p = 0.13). Median OS was 69 months (arm A) and 75 months (arm B). In the subgroup analysis, PTR was associated with improved OS in pre-menopausal patients, or those with single-organ metastasis. LRFS in arm B was significantly longer than that in arm A (median LRFS 20 vs. 63 months: HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.53, p < 0.0001). There were no treatment-related deaths.

conclusionsPTR did not prolong OS. However, it improved local control and might benefit a subset of patients, such as those with premenopausal status or with single-organ metastasis. It also improved local relapse-free survival (LRFS), which is a clinically meaningful outcome in trials of systemic therapy. CLINICAL

trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000005586); Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180151).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID40615712
PMCPMC12405516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.