Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615708›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Even microscopic extranodal extension has significant recurrent and metastatic potential in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Takuma Morita, Toru Sasaki, Yukiko Sato, Hirofumi Fukushima, Wataru Shimbashi, Akira Seto, Yu Koizumi, Ryosuke Kamiyama, Kazunori Ichikawa, Takashi Toshiyasu and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takuma MoritaDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. tmorita.hnc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-8951
Toru SasakiDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Yukiko SatoDepartment of Pathology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi FukushimaDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Wataru ShimbashiDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Akira SetoDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Yu KoizumiDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Ryosuke KamiyamaDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Kazunori IchikawaDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Takashi ToshiyasuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Syunji TakahashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki MitaniDepartment of Head and Neck, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtranodal extension (ENE) in the metastatic lymph nodes of head and neck cancer is widely recognised as a high-risk factor for postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Major ENE (ENEma) cases have a poor prognosis; however, the potential for recurrence and metastasis in microscopic ENE (ENEmi) cases is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to analyse the characteristics of ENEma and ENEmi to verify the clinical and histopathological significance of ENEmi.

methodsWe included 170 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent initial surgery at our institution between 2012 and 2020. Using a cut-off value of 2 mm, ENE cases were divided into the ENEma group (63 cases), ENEmi group (39 cases), and ENEn (ENE none; 68 cases). Prognosis and recurrence were compared between the three groups.

resultsThere was a statistically significant decrease in the survival curve of patients with ENEma with respect to overall survival (OS) (p = 0.03). However, both ENEma and ENEmi groups showed similar curves for locoregional control (LRC) and distant control (DC). When comparing the ENEmi and ENEn groups, a statistically significant decrease in survival was observed for both LRC and DC (LRC, p = 0.02; DC, p = 0.01).

conclusionENEmi tumours have significant recurrent and metastatic potential; therefore, histopathological detection of micrometastatic lesions is of great importance. The validity of postoperative treatment for ENEmi cases needs to be verified in further prospective studies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellExtranodal ExtensionMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateAdjuvantChemoradiotherapyExtranodal extensionLymphatic metastasisMouth neoplasmsSquamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.