ArticleCommunications biology2025
Bidirectional information flow in cooperative learning reflects emergent leadership.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning with others: teacher-learner brain synchrony depends on mutual gaze and joint attention.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Bidirectional information flow in cooperative learning reflects emergent leadership.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in social neuroscience have shown that one of the fundamental characteristics of cooperative learning is synchronization between learners' brains. However, the directionality of this synchronization, and the role of emergent leadership (i.e., a group leader emerges naturally), in cooperative learning remain unclear. Here, we investigated the directionality and dynamics of information flow by leveraging functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning and Granger causality analysis (GCA). Through a 6 min dyadic cooperative learning task, we observed that dyads' utterance score increased over time and remained stable at the end of interaction, suggesting successful cooperative learning. At the neural level, we found a stronger leader-to-follower Granger causality in the left middle temporal gyrus, alongside a more pronounced follower-to-leader causality in the left sensorimotor cortex. Moreover, we found that information transfer in both directions increased and peaked around the first half of time into the task, followed by a decline. These temporally similar yet spatially dissociable patterns of directional information flow suggest a hierarchical organization of bidirectional communication during cooperative learning with emergent leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.