ArticleGeroScience2026
Gene expression and co-expression heterogeneity patterns and biodemography analyses during the cell cycle encourage aging studies in archaea.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development of a novel series of thiazole-based compounds with enhanced antiproliferative properties as tubulin polymerization inhibitors.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the prokaryotic partners at the origin of eukaryotes was an archaeon, but do archaea age, and if so, how? Uncovering aging in Archaea might provide more general clues about cellular senescence and rejuvenation and their origins. To fill this knowledge gap, we focused on Saccharolobus islandicus, a model archaeon for which the cell cycle can be synchronized and controlled. We generated longitudinal transcriptomes of synchronized S. islandicus populations that capture typical expression and co-expression profiles associated with chronological aging. These experiments also allowed us to infer average cellular death rates during the cell cycle. Our results are compatible with general patterns of biological aging observed in single cells. However, at the population level, we observe a peak of mortality shortly after cell division in S. islandicus, which we interpret as "negative" demographic aging or ontogenescence, i.e., pre-reproductive mortality decline. To reconcile these observations, we propose a model of S. islandicus aging and rejuvenation. Our research constitutes a first step into the study of aging in archaea on the basis of gene expression, gene co-expression patterns during the cell cycle and biodemography analyses, and proposes a hypothetical new model to explore how cellular senescence and rejuvenation in eukaryotes may have prokaryotic roots. Alternative interpretations of our transcriptomic results however are possible, encouraging future experimental validation of aging in Archaea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.