ReviewNPJ digital medicine2025
Understanding the gap between expectations and reality in decentralized clinical trials.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pioneering a Hybrid Decentralized Clinical Trial in South Korea: Assessing Feasibility, Data Integrity, and Participant Perceptions.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
- Digital transformation of clinical trials with remote patient monitoring solutions.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Decentralized Clinical Trials in Oncology-A Radiological Perspective.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- A Multiregional Decentralized Clinical Trial Program to Improve Access.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Article
- The potential of artificial intelligence in clinical trials.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Decentralized clinical trials: A comprehensive analysis of trends, technologies, and global challenges.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have gained long-standing interest, yet their adoption as a new paradigm remains uncertain even with broader acceptance from regulatory and industry. This study aims to unveil its evolutional trend, which helps answer what the current development stage DCT is located at as well as the underlying reasons. While DCTs' prime time has not arrived, we propose solutions to advance their sustainable implementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.