ArticleScientific reports2025
Bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis of the causal associations between serum vitamin D levels and multiple kidney diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between vitamin D levels and the risk of kidney diseases, such as IgA nephropathy (IgAN), membranous nephropathy (MN), and diabetic nephropathy (DN), is still debated in observational studies. This research aims to evaluate the causal relationships between vitamin D and these kidney diseases using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. We obtained summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on serum 25(OH)D levels, IgAN, MN, and DN to assess the causal impact of vitamin D on these kidney diseases. The primary method used for MR analysis was the inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach. To further ascertain the stability and reliability of our results, we performed sensitivity analyses including Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and leave-one-out analysis, which helped identify potential pleiotropy and outlier single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) influencing the associations. Our analysis revealed no causal relationships between serum 25(OH)D levels and the risks of IgAN, MN, and DN. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the MR findings. This MR analysis robustly refutes causal associations between genetically determined 25(OH)D levels and IgAN, MN, and DN. These null findings challenge the paradigm of vitamin D supplementation as a preventive strategy for these nephropathies, urging clinicians to prioritize interventions targeting modifiable risk factors over vitamin D optimization in kidney disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.