ReviewEye (London, England)2025
Advances in corneal transplantation.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Aqueous flare dynamics following penetrating, anterior lamellar, and endothelial corneal transplantation: Quantitative comparison and early complication detection.Eye (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Bilateral Lipid Keratopathy Treated with Staged Penetrating Keratoplasty: Restoration of Corneal Transparency and Visual Function.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Next-generation smart ophthalmic biomaterials: From passive response to active interaction and closed-loop control.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Application in Cornea and External Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Corneal Diseases and Corneal Transplantation: Current Updates and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For many corneal diseases, transplantation is the gold standard for curative treatment and restoration of vision. Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), performed by Zirm in 1905, was the first successful corneal transplantation procedure. Since then, relentless advancement in the field has occurred, most importantly with the development of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), which have been rapidly increasing in usage and are poised to take over PKP in prevalence and effectiveness in treating specific stromal and endothelial pathologies. The biggest issues currently facing this field are the lack of availability of donor corneas and lack of accessibility of the procedure to many areas of the world. Recent and future advancements are focused on substitutes to increase the amount of graft material for use and technological developments to streamline keratoplasty techniques, making them more effective, easier to perform and associated with less complications. Bio-engineered corneas, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine can create grafts through various mechanisms: acellular, synthetic scaffolds and medical therapies to promote endogenous cell regeneration or exogenous cultivation of corneal tissues from stem-cells. Keratoplasty has also been refined by the introduction of femtosecond laser (FSL), which when combined with intra-operative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) allows for finer cuts and novel techniques which can improve the outcomes from PKP, DALK and DMEK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.