ArticleScientific reports2025
Association of incidence of colorectal polyp with markers of insulin resistance and other related factors: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the relationship between the incidence of colorectal polyps and related factors such as markers of insulin resistance (IR) , a retrospective analysis was used to collect 2716 patients who underwent physical examinations in Guangzhou Cadre and Talent Health Management Center from June 2020 to June 2023. The patients were classified as colorectal polyp group (n = 1328) and non-polyp group (n = 1388) after colonoscopy. Baseline data of colorectal polyp and non-polyp groups were compared. Non-insulin-based IR markers including Triglyceride Glucose Index (TyG), triglyceride glucose index (TyG)- Body Mass Index(BMI), triglycerides (TG)/high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were calculated. The risk factors of colorectal polyps were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the ability of insulin resistance markers to detect colorectal polyps. The proportion of males in colorectal polyp group was higher than that in non-polyp group. There were significant differences in TyG-BMI, TyG, TG/HDL-C, METS-IR, MAP, and other indicators between the colorectal polyp group and the non-polyp group (p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that elevation in age, BMI, TyG-BMI, TyG, TG/HDL-C, METS-IR, MAP and CEA were positively correlated with the risk of colorectal polyps (p < 0.05). The AUCs of insulin resistance markers and MAP were larger than CEA to detect colorectal polyps. The AUC values of models in combination of age, sex and insulin resistance markers/MAP is higher. TyG, TyG-BMI, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR could be used as indicators to predict the occurrence of colorectal polyps. These findings provide an important clinical reference for the prevention and treatment of colorectal polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.