ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of suicide using web based voice recordings analyzed by artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Smartphone-Based Acoustic Machine Learning Pipeline for Detecting Suicidal Ideation: Case-Control Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Predicting imminent suicide risk in a crisis hotline chat using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of machine learning (ML) and deep learning models in suicide risk assessment has advanced significantly in recent years. In this study, we utilized ML in a case-control design, we predicted completed suicides using publicly available, web-based, real-world voice data, and treating speech as a biomarker. Our model demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing between individuals who died by suicide and carefully matched controls achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. This improved to an AUC of 0.85 and an accuracy of 76% when analyzing the subset of individuals who died by suicide within 12 months of the audio recording. The best predictive performance was observed with the Multilayer perceptron model, particularly when using the all Bene, Q + U Bene, and Q + U Raw feature sets-highlighting the importance of combining structured and unstructured paralinguistic features. The findings highlight the critical temporal proximity of voice biomarkers to suicide risk. The model's robustness is further evidenced by its resilience to perturbations in the analytical pipeline. This is the first study to successfully predict actual suicidal behavior rather than surrogate markers, marking a major step forward in suicide prevention. By demonstrating that speech can serve as a non-invasive and objective biomarker for suicide risk, this research opens new avenues for diagnostic and prognostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.