ArticleScientific reports2025
A tailored deep learning approach for early detection of oral cancer using a 19-layer CNN on clinical lip and tongue images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- EffiSegNet: Advances in Automated Segmentation of Actinic Cheilitis and Lip Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Clinical Photographs.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026Article
- Enhanced Histopathologic Image Analysis for Mouth Cancer Classification Using Morphological Reconstruction and UNet.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Evolving Landscape for Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Histopathologic Assessment of Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer.Head and neck pathology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and triage in oral cancer: a clinician‑centered narrative review.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Explainable vision transformer framework for multi-class classification and prognostic interpretation of oral cancer in histopathology images.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate detection of oral cancer plays a pivotal role in improving patient outcomes. This research introduces a custom-designed, 19-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) for the automated diagnosis of oral cancer using clinical images of the lips and tongue. The methodology integrates advanced preprocessing steps, including min-max normalization and histogram-based contrast enhancement, to optimize image features critical for reliable classification. The model is extensively validated on the publicly available Oral Cancer (Lips and Tongue) Images (OCI) dataset, which is divided into 80% training and 20% testing subsets. Comprehensive performance evaluation employs established metrics-accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Our CNN architecture achieved an accuracy of 99.54%, sensitivity of 95.73%, specificity of 96.21%, precision of 96.34%, and F1-score of 96.03%, demonstrating substantial improvements over prominent transfer learning benchmarks, including SqueezeNet, AlexNet, Inception, VGG19, and ResNet50, all tested under identical experimental protocols. The model's robust performance, efficient computation, and high reliability underline its practicality for clinical application and support its superiority over existing approaches. This study provides a reproducible pipeline and a new reference point for deep learning-based oral cancer detection, facilitating translation into real-world healthcare environments and promising enhanced diagnostic confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.