ArticleMolecular psychiatry2025
Characteristics of brain network connectome and connectome-based efficacy predictive model in bipolar depression.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing Treatment Strategies in the Bipolar Disorder Spectrum With Classical AI Approaches: Systematic Review of Performance, Bias, and Clinical Applicability.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular and Neuroimaging Correlates of Bipolar Disorder: Linking Inflammation, Mitochondria, and Brain Circuitry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Structural Alterations and Cognitive Impairment in Late-Onset Depression: A Reverse Correlation Analysis.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aberrant functional connectivity (FC) between brain networks has been indicated closely associated with bipolar disorder (BD). However, the previous findings of specific brain network connectivity patterns have been inconsistent, and the clinical utility of FCs for predicting treatment outcomes in bipolar depression was underexplored. To identify robust neuro-biomarkers of bipolar depression, a connectome-based analysis was conducted on resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) data of 580 bipolar depression patients and 116 healthy controls (HCs). A subsample of 148 patients underwent a 4-week quetiapine treatment with post-treatment clinical assessment. Adopting machine learning, a predictive model based on pre-treatment brain connectome was then constructed to predict treatment response and identify the efficacy-specific networks. Distinct brain network connectivity patterns were observed in bipolar depression compared to HCs. Elevated intra-network connectivity was identified within the default mode network (DMN), sensorimotor network (SMN), and subcortical network (SC); and as to the inter-network connectivity, increased FCs were between the DMN, SMN and frontoparietal (FPN), ventral attention network (VAN), and decreased FCs were between the SC and cortical networks, especially the DMN and FPN. And the global network topology analyses revealed decreased global efficiency and increased characteristic path length in BD compared to HC. Further, the support vector regression model successfully predicted the efficacy of quetiapine treatment, as indicated by a high correspondence between predicted and actual HAMD reduction ratio values (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
40615558What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.