ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
Machine learning-based prediction of G-CSF-induced hematopoietic stem cell mobilization outcomes in healthy volunteers.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced deep learning enables prediction of allogeneic stem cell mobilization success.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Addressing the translation gap in SCT donor selection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSC-T) has been established as a fundamental therapeutic intervention for a wide range of hematological malignancies and disorders, with a proven record of efficacy spanning over five decades. Peripheral blood (PB) has become the haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) source of choice, surpassing bone marrow, owing to its cost-effectiveness, reduced invasiveness, higher cell yields, and shorter hospitalizations. Clinically, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration is the standard procedure for inducing HSC mobilization. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of potential donors, ranging from 5% to 10%, exhibit suboptimal mobilization responses to G-CSF. To investigate this, we carried out a retrospective analysis of mobilization data from 1056 donors who underwent G-CSF-induced HSC mobilization over the 5-year period from 2018 to 2023. This comprehensive study elucidated the complex interplay between mobilization efficacy, as measured primarily by CD34+ cell yield, and a variety of influencing factors. Our data indicate that better mobilization outcomes are achieved in male donors than female donors. Additionally, we found a positive correlation between increased body weight and improved mobilization efficiency, implying a more favourable response to G-CSF in obese donors. Moreover, the implementation of a split-dose regimen for the mobilization agent significantly improved outcomes, highlighting the critical role of dosing strategies. Notably, younger donors exhibited better mobilization responses, underscoring age as a pivotal determinant of mobilization outcomes. Leveraging machine learning (ML) algorithms, we developed seven predictive models designed to forecast G-CSF-induced HSC mobilization outcomes on the basis of these variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40615536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.