ArticleScientific reports2025
Sperm metabolomic signatures of asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia in Chinese reproductive-age men.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unravelling deregulated metabolites in seminal plasma of infertile men: a systematic review and bioinformatic analysis.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic classification and medical decision of idiopathic asthenozoospermia based on metabolomics analysis of seminal plasma.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Metabolic pathways fueling human spermatozoa capacitation and hyperactivation: a roadmap for spermatozoa bioenergetics.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- A modular, mechanism-informed biomarker panel for asthenozoospermia based on integrative sperm proteomics.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia are common causes of male infertility. Despite their prevalence, the underlying metabolic mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we conducted targeted metabolomic profiling of sperm samples from 131 Chinese reproductive-age men (48 normozoospermic controls, 40 asthenozoospermic patients, and 43 teratozoospermic patients) to identify distinct metabolic signatures associated with these conditions. We identified 47 significantly altered metabolites in asthenozoospermia compared to normozoospermia (18 downregulated and 29 upregulated). In teratozoospermia, 25 metabolites showed significant changes compared to normozoospermia (10 downregulated, 15 upregulated). These differential metabolites, along with others identified through machine learning as relevant, are implicated in key pathways including energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, and amino acid metabolism. Alterations, such as those in corticosterone and hypoxanthine, suggest potential impacts on redox balance and stress responses. Using machine learning approaches, we developed diagnostic models for asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia diagnosis, with the Glmnet model showing strong performance (AUC = 0.99 for asthenozoospermia, AUC = 0.9997 for teratozoospermia), although these results require external validation. Two metabolites emerged as candidate diagnostic biomarkers: corticosterone reveals common metabolic disturbances in both pathological conditions, and arachidate specifically indicates impaired lipid metabolism in asthenozoospermia. These findings improve our understanding of the metabolic basis of sperm dysfunction, and highlight the potential of sperm metabolomics as a powerful tool for diagnosing and managing male infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.