ArticleScientific reports2025
Metal loss defect detection and depth estimation using multi-spectral image analysis of cooling excited steel specimen with corrosion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corrosion Screening of Greenhouse Structural Steel Pipes Using Cold Infrared Thermography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficient industrial point cloud anomaly detection via spatial context aggregation and selective anomalous feature generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Imaging techniques have considerably improved corrosion-induced metal loss defect detection and severity estimation in recent decades. Even though the detection of defects using imaging techniques in steel is well established, determining the severity remains difficult due to the necessity of estimating the depth information of the defect from 2-dimensional image data. This study used a steel test specimen with artificial defects of varying depths and diameters, subjected to accelerated corrosion. A Multi-Spectral Imaging setup observed the specimen's spectral response at different temperatures following a cooling excitation. Reflected intensities at specific wavelengths indicated defect presence and allowed quantification of corrosion-induced metal loss. Principal Component Analysis and machine learning regression were used to transform discrete defect depths into continuous assessments. Support Vector Regression, Decision Tree Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and a Feedforward Neural Network (FNN) were tested for this task. The FNN showed the best results in solving the regression problem with a least Root Mean Square Error of 0.2829 and an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.