ArticleScientific reports2025
Conceptualizing phytoplankton communities in the absence of resource based competitive exclusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Competition for resources has long been viewed as a dominant mechanism for species exclusion in nature. Laboratory phytoplankton competition experiments have clearly demonstrated the principles of resource-based competitive exclusion, yielding the decades-old 'R* rule' stating that the species able to maintain steady-state biomass at the lowest resource level (R*) will outcompete all other species and that the number of stably coexisting species will equal the number of different limiting resources. However, the notion of resource-based competitive exclusion is clearly violated by natural phytoplankton assemblages that consistently exhibit coexisting species with vastly different resource acquisition potentials. Here, we explain why natural phytoplankton communities do not obey the 'R* rule', why cell-to-cell distancing and predator-prey dynamics prevent resource-based competitive exclusion, and why phytoplankton diversity is theoretically unconstrained within size-specific ecological niches created by predator-prey sets. We conclude this manuscript with an appeal that a more holistic, ecological explanation of competitive exclusion and biodiversity be adopted and taught that nurtures a more thorough understanding and modeling of natural phytoplankton and other microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.