ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
AI assistance enhances histopathologic distinction between sebaceous and squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma grading framework using histopathological images via artificial intelligence: a benchmarking study.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Case Report: Sebaceous lymphadenocarcinoma arising in parotid gland: eighth documented case with lymph node metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in oculoplastics: Novel applications and future prospects.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) and some poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas (SC) of the eyelid may have overlapping clinical and histopathologic features, leading to potential misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. The authors developed a deep learning (DL)-based pathological analysis framework to classify SGC and SC automatically. In total, 282 whole slide images (WSIs) were used for training, validating and inner testing the DL framework and 36 WSIs were obtained from another hospital as an external testing dataset. In WSI level, the diagnostic accuracy of SGC and SC achieved 84.85% and 75.12%, respectively, in the internal testing set and reached 22.22% and 77.78%, respectively, in the external testing set. The accuracy of the pathologists could be improved with the AI framework (60.0 ± 9.8% vs. 76.8 ± 9.6%). This AI-based automatic pathological diagnostic framework achieved the performance of a well-experienced pathologist and can assist pathologists in making diagnoses more accurately, especially for non-ophthalmic pathologists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.