ArticleScientific reports2025
Shape sensing robotic assisted bronchoscopy versus virtual bronchoscopic navigation in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of learning curves between electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy and Ion robotic bronchoscopy for preoperative localization.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Learning Curve of Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy (ssRAB) for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions in a Thoracic Surgery Center Using the ION System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Annual progress in transbronchial diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary malignant tumors [2025]: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- [Expert Consensus on Precision Management of Pulmonary Nodules (2026 Version)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Use of Dual Bronchoscopes for Targeted Biopsy of Peripheral Lung Lesions: The Kissing Probe Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bronchoscopy is a commonly used method for pulmonary nodule biopsy. Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB), which features enhanced catheter articulation and stability, has recently become available. Although the diagnostic performance of ssRAB appears to surpass that of conventional guided bronchoscopy, the existing data are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and safety of ssRAB compared with those of virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs). This retrospective comparative study involved consecutive patients who underwent ssRAB or VBN for diagnosing PPNs at the Henan Provincial People's Hospital between October 2021 and June 2022. Clinical data, nodule and procedure characteristics, outcomes, and complications were compared. Final diagnoses were established on the basis of pathological interpretations, which were complemented by clinical and radiographic follow-up data and/or additional sampling, as necessary. The enrolled patients underwent follow-up visits for a duration of 2 years after the procedure. The study included 59 patients, of whom 30 received ssRAB and 29 received VBN. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of patient demographics or nodule or procedure characteristics. Compared with the VBN group, the ssRAB group presented a significantly greater overall diagnostic yield (69.0% vs. 90.0%, p = 0.045). No procedure-related complications occurred in the ssRAB group, whereas two cases of pneumothorax occurred in the VBN group, with symptom improvement after the placement of closed thoracic drainage. Compared with VBN, ssRAB offers a more promising diagnostic approach with a greater diagnostic efficacy for sampling PPNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.