Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615476›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Intelligent brain tumor detection using hybrid finetuned deep transfer features and ensemble machine learning algorithms.

Rakesh Salakapuri, Panduranga Vital Terlapu, Kishore Raju Kalidindi, Ramesh Naidu Balaka, D Jayaram, T Ravikumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rakesh SalakapuriSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Hyderabad Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. srakesh@sithyd.siu.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-2661
Panduranga Vital TerlapuAditya Institute of Technology and Management, K-Kotturu, Tekkali, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, 532 201, India. vital2927@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4393-0692
Kishore Raju KalidindiS R K R Engineering College, West Godavari., Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, 534 202, India.
Ramesh Naidu BalakaAditya Institute of Technology and Management, K-Kotturu, Tekkali, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, 532 201, India.
D JayaramChaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
T RavikumarAditya Institute of Technology and Management, K-Kotturu, Tekkali, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, 532 201, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumours (BTs) are severe neurological disorders. They affect more than 308,000 people each year worldwide. The mortality rate is over 251,000 deaths annually (IARC, 2020 reports). Detecting BTs is complex because they vary in nature. Early diagnosis is essential for better survival rates. The study presents a new system for detecting BTs. It combines deep (DL) learning and machine (ML) learning techniques. The system uses advanced models like Inception-V3, ResNet-50, and VGG-16 for feature extraction, and for dimensional reduction, it uses the PCA model. It also employs ensemble methods such as Stacking, k-NN, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Support Vector Machines for classification and predicts the BTs using MRI scans. The MRI scans were resized to 224 × 224 pixels, and pixel intensities were normalized to a [0,1] scale. We apply the Gaussian filter for stability. We use the Keras Image Data Generator for image augmentation. It applied methods like zooming and ± 10% brightness adjustments. The dataset has 5,712 MRI scans. These scans are classified into four groups: Meningioma, No-Tumor, Glioma, and Pituitary. A tenfold cross-validation method helps check if the model is reliable. Deep transfer (TL) learning and ensemble ML models work well together. They showed excellent results in detecting BTs. The stacking ensemble model achieved the highest accuracy across all feature extraction methods, with ResNet-50 features reduced by PCA (500), producing an accuracy of 0.957, 95% CI: 0.948-0.966; AUC: 0.996, 95% CI: 0.989-0.998, significantly outperforming baselines (p < 0.01). Neural networks and gradient-boosting models also show strong performance. The stacking model is robust and reliable. This method is useful for medical applications. Future studies will focus on using multi-modal imaging. This will help improve diagnostic accuracy. The research improves early detection of brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineBrain tumorDeep learningEnsemble machine learningFeature extractionMRI image classificationPCATransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40615476
PMCPMC12227733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.