ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent brain tumor detection using hybrid finetuned deep transfer features and ensemble machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent earthquake prediction using animal vocal behavior analysis based on machine learning and deep learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumours (BTs) are severe neurological disorders. They affect more than 308,000 people each year worldwide. The mortality rate is over 251,000 deaths annually (IARC, 2020 reports). Detecting BTs is complex because they vary in nature. Early diagnosis is essential for better survival rates. The study presents a new system for detecting BTs. It combines deep (DL) learning and machine (ML) learning techniques. The system uses advanced models like Inception-V3, ResNet-50, and VGG-16 for feature extraction, and for dimensional reduction, it uses the PCA model. It also employs ensemble methods such as Stacking, k-NN, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Support Vector Machines for classification and predicts the BTs using MRI scans. The MRI scans were resized to 224 × 224 pixels, and pixel intensities were normalized to a [0,1] scale. We apply the Gaussian filter for stability. We use the Keras Image Data Generator for image augmentation. It applied methods like zooming and ± 10% brightness adjustments. The dataset has 5,712 MRI scans. These scans are classified into four groups: Meningioma, No-Tumor, Glioma, and Pituitary. A tenfold cross-validation method helps check if the model is reliable. Deep transfer (TL) learning and ensemble ML models work well together. They showed excellent results in detecting BTs. The stacking ensemble model achieved the highest accuracy across all feature extraction methods, with ResNet-50 features reduced by PCA (500), producing an accuracy of 0.957, 95% CI: 0.948-0.966; AUC: 0.996, 95% CI: 0.989-0.998, significantly outperforming baselines (p < 0.01). Neural networks and gradient-boosting models also show strong performance. The stacking model is robust and reliable. This method is useful for medical applications. Future studies will focus on using multi-modal imaging. This will help improve diagnostic accuracy. The research improves early detection of brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.