Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615474›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A robust machine learning approach to predicting remission and stratifying risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with bDMARDs.

Fatemeh Salehi, Emmanuelle Salin, Benjamin Smarr, Sara Bayat, Arnd Kleyer, Georg Schett, Ruth Fritsch-Stork, Bjoern M Eskofier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fatemeh SalehiMachine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052, Erlangen, Germany. fatemeh.salehihafshejani@fau.de.
Emmanuelle SalinMachine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052, Erlangen, Germany.
Benjamin SmarrHalıcıoğlu Institute for Data Science, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sara BayatDepartment of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Arnd KleyerDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Georg SchettDepartment of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Ruth Fritsch-Stork *BIOREG, Health Care Centre Mariahilf, ÖGK and Rheumatology Department, Sigmund Freud Private University, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Bjoern M Eskofier *Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting millions worldwide, leading to inflammation, joint damage, and reduced quality of life. Although biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are effective, they are costly, and up to 40% of patients do not achieve remission within six months. Accurate prediction of treatment response is crucial for optimizing care, minimizing side effects, and enhancing cost efficiency. This study proposes a robust machine learning framework for predicting six-month remission in RA patients using baseline routine clinical data. The framework also integrates risk stratification and explainability to enhance its clinical applicability. We evaluated multiple machine learning models, AdaBoost, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Support Vector Machines, using data from Austrian RA patients. We externally validated the results on an independent dataset from the Erlangen Hospital. To improve the reliability of probability estimates for actionable risk stratification, we employed calibration techniques, including Platt scaling, Isotonic regression, Beta calibration, and Spline calibration. We generated calibration curves to assess and visualize the alignment between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes. In addition, we used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to analyze the contributions of different patient characteristics to the prediction of RA remission. AdaBoost demonstrated stronger performance than the other models, achieving an accuracy of 85.71% and a Brier score of 0.13 with isotonic regression calibration. SHAP identified DAS28, visual analog scales (VAS), age, and swollen joint count (SJC) as important characteristics for the prediction of RA remission. We also stratified patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk categories based on model predictions to support follow-up scheduling and treatment prioritization. Our framework predicts RA remission before the initiation of bDMARD therapy. It enables personalized care, actionable risk stratification, and optimized resource allocation. Its robustness was validated on two different individual cohort datasets, which highlights its potential for integration into routine clinical workflows.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRisk AssessmentSupport Vector MachineTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID40615474
PMCPMC12227524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.