Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615452›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Convolutional neural networks with transfer learning for natural river flow prediction in ungauged basins.

Henrique Echternacht, Luciana Campos, Alfeu Dias de Martinho, Danilo Pinto Moreira de Souza, Rodrigo Barbosa de Santis, Tiago Silveira Gontijo, Matteo Bodini, Angela Gorgoglione, Camila Martins Saporetti, Leonardo Goliatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Henrique EchternachtFederal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Luciana CamposDepartment of Computer Science, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Alfeu Dias de MartinhoDepartment of Exact Sciences and Technology, Púnguè University, Campus Universitário de Cambinde, Matundo, Tete, Mozambique. alfeu.martinho@unipungue.ac.mz.
Danilo Pinto Moreira de SouzaComputational Modeling Program, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Rodrigo Barbosa de SantisDepartment of Computer Science, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Tiago Silveira GontijoCampus Centro Oeste, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil.
Matteo BodiniDipartimento di Economia, Management e Metodi Quantitativi, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Angela GorgoglioneDepartment of Fluid Mechanics and Environmental Engineering (IMFIA), School of Engineering, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Camila Martins SaporettiDepartment of Computational Modeling, Polytechnic Institute, Rio de Janeiro State University, Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil.
Leonardo GoliattDepartment of Computational and Applied Mechanics, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in several scientific domains, there is a rising demand for advanced AI tools capable of addressing advanced research challenges. A challenge of paramount importance lies in accurately predicting the streamflow within river basins. Effective river flow prediction holds significant relevance, particularly given the substantial societal implications of river usage, encompassing areas such as transportation, agriculture, and power generation. The present study introduces a novel approach to streamflow prediction involving the development of a Deep Learning (DL) model that combines a convolutional neural network with Transfer Learning (TL) techniques to predict streamflow in river systems. With the aim of training the developed DL model, the study employed a time-series dataset containing hydrological data related to two distinct river basins, i.e., Paraíba do Sul, in Brazil, and Zambezi in the state of Mozambique. The developed DL models exhibited the capability to effectively predict the river flow with a one-day horizon, relying on the preceding three or seven days of historical data. To overcome the limited availability of training data and reduce the training time of DL models, TL was leveraged to incorporate two additional distinct time-series datasets, i.e., historical streamflow data from the São Francisco River in Brazil, and climate data from Delhi, India. The application of TL significantly reduced training time, leading only to a minimal decrease in prediction performance. Indeed, in the case DL models were trained on data collected from the Paraíba do Sul River, a substantial reduction in training time was observed - up to 27% - with a modest percentage decrease of 0.31% in test predictive performance ([Formula: see text]). Similarly, TL induced a significant reduction in training time of up to 48%, while resulting in a modest 2% reduction in test predictive performance ([Formula: see text]) for the Zambezi dataset. The findings underscore the significance of TL as a strategic and viable approach to improve the efficiency of river flow prediction models in the context of basins with limited hydrological data available.

Identifiers

PMID40615452
PMCPMC12227612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.