ArticleScientific reports2025
An international multi-cohort investigation of self-reported sleep and future depressive symptoms in older adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additive Burden of Low Peak Expiratory Flow and Sleep Disturbance on Incident Depressive Symptoms in Later Life: A Four-Cohort Longitudinal Study of 49,201 Participants.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pediatric precision sleep network: a study protocol for identifying sleep signatures of mental health risk in peri-adolescents.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Sleep Health Dimensions From Wearables and Transdiagnostic Mental Health in Young Adolescents.JAMA pediatrics · 2026Article
- Multidimensional self-reported sleep health, cognitive decline, and risk of all-cause dementia: A population-based multi-cohort study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poor subjective sleep is associated with future depression in older adults, but there is limited consensus on which sleep features have the strongest associations. Moreover, composite scores incorporating multiple features may better represent sleep burden than individual sleep items. We analyzed older adults (age ≥ 60) without clinically relevant depressive symptoms from a multi-cohort United States sample (US; N = 4826) and the Netherlands' Rotterdam Study (RS; N = 3663), with the goal of identifying individual and composite sleep features that are associated with future clinically relevant depressive symptoms 3-6 years later. Sleep-related daytime symptoms (Risk Ratio [95% CI] 2.10 [1.58, 2.80] in US; 2.10 [1.40, 3.14] in RS) and difficulty falling asleep (1.87 [1.49, 2.35] in US; RS = 1.90 [1.50, 2.43] in RS) were the strongest individual sleep features. Moreover, the combination of these features was most impactful (3.32 [2.33, 4.73] in US; 3.19 [2.64, 3.86] in RS), providing the largest effect size with the fewest number of items. Future studies should assess whether screening tools incorporating these features, paired with targeted sleep treatment, could reduce rates of incident depression in older adults. Examining mechanisms underlying these associations could improve the effectiveness of sleep-related treatments in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.