Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615420›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrating AI predictive analytics with naturopathic and yoga-based interventions in a data-driven preventive model to improve maternal mental health and pregnancy outcomes.

Neha Irfan, Sherin Zafar, Kashish Ara Shakil, Mudasir Ahmad Wani, S N Kumar, A Jaiganesh, K M Abubeker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neha IrfanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering Science and Technology, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Sherin ZafarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering Science and Technology, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India. sherin.zafar@jamiahamdard.ac.in.
Kashish Ara ShakilDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint AbdulRahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. kashakil@pnu.edu.sa.
Mudasir Ahmad WaniEIAS Data Science and Blockchain Laboratory, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi Arabia.
S N KumarAmal Jyothi College of Engineering, Kanjirappally, Kerala, India.
A JaiganeshSri Maya Yoga and Nature Cure Center, Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu, India.
K M AbubekerAmal Jyothi College of Engineering, Kanjirappally, Kerala, India.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia PNURSP2025R757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal mental health during pregnancy is a crucial area of research due to its profound impact on both maternal and child well-being. This paper proposes a comprehensive approach to predicting and monitoring psychological health risks in pregnant women using advanced machine learning techniques. The study employs a systematic methodology including data collection, preprocessing, feature selection, and model implementation. Data collection was conducted at Majidia Hospital, involving a diverse sample of 70,000 pregnant women recruited through antenatal clinics, online health platforms, community outreach programs, and telephone surveys using structured questionnaires. Participants were selected across all pregnancy trimesters to ensure a representative demographic, capturing variations in age, educational background, occupational status, and parity. A diverse set of machine learning models, including Random Forest, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were evaluated alongside ensemble methods to achieve robust and reliable predictions. The experimental results demonstrate that the Random Forest model consistently outperforms other classifiers with an accuracy of 97.82% ± 0.03%, precision of 97.82% ± 0.03%, recall of 100.00% ± 0.00%, and an F1 score of 96.81% ± 0.02%. SVM and Decision Tree classifiers also showed strong performance, with accuracy scores of 93.79% ± 0.01% and 91.82% ± 0.03%, respectively. Furthermore, ensemble methods enhanced predictive performance, highlighting their ability to balance accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. In regression tasks, the Random Forest Regressor achieved near-perfect predictions with a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 4.5767 × 10

Indexed as

Mental HealthYogaAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaternal HealthPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSupport Vector MachineYoung AdultAI-driven psychological assessmentAnxiety and depression detectionMaternal mental healthPregnancy-related psychological healthPregnancy risk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40615420
PMCPMC12227558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.