Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quantitative evaluation of thermal runaway in lithium-ion batteries under critical heating conditions to enhance safety.

Omar S Mahdy, Ali B M Ali, Loghman Mostafa, Diwakar Agarwal, Aashim Dhawan, Abdelkader Mabrouk, Lioua Kolsi, Lotfi Ben Said

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Omar S MahdyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology, 52 Alsinaa St., P.O. Box 35010, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali B M AliAir Conditioning Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Karbala, Iraq.
Loghman MostafaDepartment of Medical Biochemical Analysis, College of Health Technology, Cihan University-Erbil, Erbil, Iraq. loghman.mostafa@cihanuniversity.edu.iq.
Diwakar AgarwalDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Technology, GLA University, Mathura, India.
Aashim DhawanCentre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140417, India.
Abdelkader MabroukDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Northern Border University, 73222, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Lioua KolsiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Ha'il, 81451, Ha'il City, Saudi Arabia.
Lotfi Ben SaidDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Ha'il, 81451, Ha'il City, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal stability in lithium-ion batteries is crucial for ensuring safety in energy storage systems and electric vehicles, where thermal runaway poses significant risks due to localized heating and the uncontrolled propagation of exothermic reactions. This study investigates the thermal dynamics in lithium-ion batteries under various critical heating conditions using a three-dimensional finite volume model. The research examines the effects of heating power, heating positions, and cell spacing on thermal runaway propagation patterns, focusing on both single-cell and multi-cell battery pack configurations. Analysis revealed that the direction of heat flow plays a significant role in thermal behavior, with side heating leading to faster runaway and central heating initially delaying initiation before accelerating at specific thresholds. Key findings indicate that lithium iron fluoride cathode materials exhibit superior thermal stability compared to nickel-manganese-cobalt-aluminum oxide types, and increasing cell spacing reduces the severity and timing of thermal runaway. A comparative evaluation of heating scenarios-side, central, and vertical-highlighted vertical 20 mm heating as the safest option. Moreover, the study details the heat release dynamics of different chemical processes: the negative solvent contributed the most significant heat generation (1.78 kW), while the solid electrolyte interphase layer produced the lowest (0.133 kW). Non-linear impacts of heating power were also observed, with a 7 kW/m

Indexed as

Critical heating conditionsLithium-ion batteriesQuantitative evaluationSafety enhancementThermal runaway

Identifiers

PMID40615412
PMCPMC12227631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.