Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615394›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fine-tuning of language models for automated structuring of medical exam reports to improve patient screening and analysis.

Luis B Elvas, Rafaela Santos, João C Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis B ElvasDepartment of Logistics, Molde, University College, Britvegen 2, 6410, Molde, Norway. luis.m.elvas@himolde.no.
Rafaela SantosISTAR, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026, Lisbon, Portugal.
João C FerreiraDepartment of Logistics, Molde, University College, Britvegen 2, 6410, Molde, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of medical imaging reports is labour-intensive but crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective patient screening. Often presented as unstructured text, these reports require systematic organisation for efficient interpretation. This study applies Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques tailored for European Portuguese to automate the analysis of cardiology reports, streamlining patient screening. Using a methodology involving tokenization, part-of-speech tagging and manual annotation, the MediAlbertina PT-PT language model was fine-tuned, achieving 96.13% accuracy in entity recognition. The system enables rapid identification of conditions such as aortic stenosis through an interactive interface, substantially reducing the time and effort required for manual review. It also facilitates patient monitoring and disease quantification, optimising healthcare resource allocation. This research highlights the potential of NLP tools in Portuguese healthcare contexts, demonstrating their applicability to medical report analysis and their broader relevance in improving efficiency and decision-making in diverse clinical environments.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingNatural Language ProcessingHumansLarge Language ModelsData miningHealthcareLanguage modelsNamed entity recognition (NER)Natural Language processing (NLP)

Identifiers

PMID40615394
PMCPMC12227585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.