ArticleNature communications2025
Utility of synthetic musculoskeletal gaits for generalizable healthcare applications.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Assessment of the Four-Chamber View in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Videos.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Visualization and Detection of the Pulmonary Venous-Left Atrium Connection Using Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Screening.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep-neural-network-based artificial intelligence enables quantitative gait analysis with commodity sensors. However, current gait-analysis models are usually specialized for specific clinical populations and sensor settings due to the limited size and diversity of available datasets. We propose an approach that involves using synthetic gaits generated using a generative model learned via physics-based simulation with a broad spectrum of musculoskeletal parameters and evaluated its utility for data-efficient generalization of gait-analysis models across different clinical populations and sensor settings. The model trained solely on synthetic data estimates gait parameters with comparable or superior performance compared with real-data-trained models specialized for specific populations and sensor settings. Pre-training on synthetic data with self-supervised learning consistently enhances model performance and data efficiency in adapting to multiple gait-based downstream tasks. The results indicate that our approach offers an efficient means to augment data size and diversity for developing generalizable healthcare applications involving sensor-based gait analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.