Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615144›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Engagement of Indigenous peoples in commercial tobacco reform strategies: a scoping review protocol.

Andrew Daniel Perusco, Michelle Kennedy, El-Shadan Tautolo, Hershel Clark, Patricia Nez Henderson, Sydney A Martinez, Priscilla Nez, Andrew Waa, Sierra Wilcox, Penney Upton and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrew Daniel PeruscoAustralian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-9370
Michelle KennedySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-068X
El-Shadan TautoloAUT Pacific Health Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hershel ClarkBlack Hills Center for American Indian Health, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.
Patricia Nez HendersonBlack Hills Center for American Indian Health, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.
Sydney A MartinezDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Priscilla NezBlack Hills Center for American Indian Health, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.
Andrew WaaEru Pomare Maori Health Research Centre, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sierra WilcoxBlack Hills Center for American Indian Health, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.
Penney UptonHealth Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jeyasakthi VenugopalAustralian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia jeyasakthi.venugopal@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2233-5031
Raglan MaddoxYardhura Walani, National Centre for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe tobacco and nicotine industry fuels tobacco-related addiction, disease and death. Indigenous peoples experience a disproportionate burden of commercial tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. Over the past two decades, significant progress has been made in reducing smoking prevalence among Indigenous peoples; however, smoking remains a leading contributor to the burden of death and disease. This review will summarise evidence on commercial tobacco resistance and/or eradication strategies, including policy reforms, in relation to Indigenous peoples across Oceania, the Pacific Islands and North America. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews and will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. This review will consider academic and grey literature published since 1 January 2000. The following electronic databases will be searched for relevant primary research articles and commentaries: PubMed, Scopus, Informit, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Additional searches will be conducted in ProQuest to identify relevant grey literature. Papers will be screened by two reviewers to determine eligibility, followed by full-text data extraction. Findings will be synthesised descriptively for each review question and by region. Studies included in the review will be assessed against criteria for Indigenous engagement in research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was led by Indigenous interests, needs and rights of Indigenous peoples, consistent with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and ethical practice. This review was conceptualised with Indigenous leadership and through engagement, including but not limited to the Indigenous lived experience of the authors (MK, E-ST, HC, PNH, PH, SAM, AW, SW and RM). This review supports the global goal of eradicating commercial tobacco-related harms - reframing commercial tobacco use as a structurally imposed harm sustained by colonial and commercial forces rather than personal choice. Findings from this review will be shared with Indigenous partners and communities who requested this work and will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/wxqcb.

Indexed as

Indigenous PeoplesSmokingTobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicIndigenous healthpublic policysmokefreesmokingtobacco control

Identifiers

PMID40615144
PMCPMC12226939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.