ReviewStem cell reports2025
Ependymal and neural stem cells are close relatives.
Review in Stem cell reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glial Cell Niche Induces Astrocytic Differentiation of NSCs via the BMP4-Smad1/5/8 Signaling Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Potential Role of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and Its Receptors in the Reparative Processes of the Adult Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Microglia-Mediated Ependymal Injury in Bacille Calmette-Guérin-Induced Meningitis Is Attenuated by Sodium Butyrate with Restoration of Hmgcs2 Expression.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiciliated ependymal and neural stem cells are key cell populations of the subventricular zone. Recent findings revealed that at least a subpopulation of radial glial cells during embryogenesis can be bipotent and produce both neural stem cells and ependymal cells. The balance between these cell populations is orchestrated by Geminin superfamily, ensuring optimal niche function. However, whether cell fate decisions are definitive or dynamic and whether potential regional differences exist remain elusive. In this review, we delve into the shared origins of different subventricular zone cell populations, and we explore the potential interplay among them. Moreover, we compile evidence on the de-differentiation capacity of ependymal cells and their controversial neural stem cell function under specific conditions, with emphasis on the possible implication of a rare population of biciliated (E2) ependymal cells. Understanding the mechanisms regulating cell fate decisions may unravel ependymal cells' therapeutic potential in therapies targeting various human diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.