ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2025
Optimal experimental design for repeatable hyperelastic material characterization.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress-Constrained Physics-Informed UNet for Voxel-Wise Multiparameter Hyperelastic Inversion in Volumetric Medical Imaging.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Rectification of Material Model for Fibrous Materials in Compressive Mode.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable identification of hyperelastic material parameters is essential for precisely modeling the mechanical behavior of various materials including biological tissues, which in turn has significant medical applications. However, experimental configurations often lack quantitative design guidelines, leading to high variance in reported parameters and sometimes irreproducible results. To address the sensitivity of material parameter identification, this study introduces a novel "stress-material Jacobian" framework to determine optimal experimental configurations, i.e., loading mode, loading level, and number of experiments, for hyperelastic material characterization. By analyzing the determinant and condition number of the Jacobian relating the stress parameter space and the material parameter space, we propose a novel approach to determine optimal experimental configurations across different deformation ranges, modes, and hyperelastic models, providing quantitative measures for experimental design. Our method identifies configurations that minimize sensitivity to noise, ensure robustness, and reduce the number of required tests. We verify the approach on three classical hyperelastic models, namely, Neo-Hookean, Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden models, under various loading conditions. Results show significant improvement in parameter identification reproducibility and robustness to measurement uncertainties. The analysis also briefly addresses heterogeneous material characterization, paving the way for its broader application in biomechanics and engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.