Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40614332›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2025

Blood-borne virus testing in European emergency departments: current evidence and service considerations.

Elizabeth Smout, Murad Ruf, Maria Buti, Inês Vaz Pinto, Gaia Nebbia, Laura Hunter, Mark A Aldersley, Catarina Esteves, Diogo Medina, Jordi Llaneras and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Opt-in and opt-out strategies for HIV testing-author's reply.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth SmoutPublic Health, Gloucestershire NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Murad RufPublic Health, Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences Europe, London, United Kingdom.
Maria ButiLiver Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Inês Vaz PintoHIV Unit, Cascais Hospital, Cascais, Portugal.
Gaia NebbiaDepartment of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Laura HunterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Mark A AldersleyLiver Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Catarina EstevesHIV Unit, Cascais Hospital, Cascais, Portugal.
Diogo MedinaFOCUS Program, Gilead Sciences, Madrid, Spain.
Jordi LlanerasEmergency Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Sam DouthwaiteDepartment of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Emma E PageDepartment of Virology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

Arthur Smyth-MedinaBristol Myers SquibbGilead SciencesGilead Sciences EuropeMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences EuropeNexGen Healthcare Communications
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative testing approaches are needed to meet global targets for the blood-borne viruses (BBVs) HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). We conducted a systematic review of BBV testing in emergency departments (EDs) in Europe to evaluate prevalence, effectiveness of ED testing and linkage to care (LTC). We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for articles on ED BBV testing published between January 2012 and July 2022. Studies conducted outside Europe or prior to 2012 were excluded owing to epidemiological and healthcare service variation, together with studies that did not report core parameters. Reference lists from included articles were manually searched. Seventeen original articles met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported on HIV testing only. ED prevalence: HIV Ab, 0.0%-1.1%; HBsAg, 0.2%-0.9%; and HCV RNA, 0.2%-3.9%. BBV testing uptake varied by policy and offer methodology: opt-out, provider-initiated: 9.7%-44.2%; electronic health record (EHR) modification: 52.1%-88.9%; and opt-in, provider-initiated: 3.9%-37.7%. LTC rates were 8.1%-100% and varied by BBV, generally highest for HIV and lowest for HCV. There was variable detail in outcome reporting and description of clinical LTC pathways. ED BBV testing in Europe is feasible and identifies high numbers of infections (including, where reported, new diagnoses and disengaged patients), often among marginalized populations who use open-access EDs for healthcare. Factors associated with higher levels of sustained testing uptake included opt-out testing (vs opt-in), EHR (vs provider-initiated) and integration of community services. We propose a toolkit of components necessary for a high-performing ED BBV testing programme.

Indexed as

Blood-Borne InfectionsBlood-Borne PathogensEmergency Service, HospitalMass ScreeningEuropeHepatitis BHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40614332
PMCPMC12311341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.