Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40614164›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2025

Early and Late Buzzards: Comparing Different Approaches for Quantile-Based Multiple Testing in Heavy-Tailed Wildlife Research Data.

Marléne Baumeister, Merle Munko, Kai-Philipp Gladow, Marc Ditzhaus, Nayden Chakarov, Markus Pauly

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marléne BaumeisterDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9757-999X
Merle MunkoDepartment of Mathematics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-6142-8142
Kai-Philipp GladowDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0142-7383
Marc DitzhausDepartment of Mathematics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9235-1905
Nayden ChakarovDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9124-1242
Markus PaulyDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0976-7190

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 314838170Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 396780709Friedrich-Ebert-StiftungResearch Center Trustworthy Data Science and Security
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical, ecological, and psychological research, there is a need for methods to handle multiple testing, for example, to consider group comparisons with more than two groups. Typical approaches that deal with multiple testing are mean- or variance-based which can be less effective in the context of heavy-tailed and skewed data. Here, the median is the preferred measure of location and the interquartile range (IQR) is an adequate alternative to the variance. Therefore, it may be fruitful to formulate research questions of interest in terms of the median or the IQR. For this reason, we compare different inference approaches for two-sided and noninferiority hypotheses formulated in terms of medians or IQRs in an extensive simulation study. We consider multiple contrast testing procedures combined with a bootstrap method as well as testing procedures with Bonferroni correction. As an example of a multiple testing problem based on heavy-tailed data, we analyze an ecological trait variation in early and late breeding in a medium-sized bird of prey.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBiometryBirdsAnimalsBonferroni adjustmentfactorial designsmultiple contrast testsquantilesresampling

Identifiers

PMID40614164
PMCPMC12227168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.