ReviewThe FEBS journal2025
Exploring the roles of conserved context-dependent cis-regulatory elements (cdCREs) in multicellularity, human health and disease.
Review in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human development and health depend on the precise expression of relevant genes in specific cells, at precise times and in response to appropriate stimuli. This is known as context-dependent gene regulation and relies on the activities of a diverse 'zoo' of DNA elements within the genome that are collectively called context-dependent cis-regulatory elements (cdCREs). cdCREs may comprise as much as 10% of the genome and include better-known sequences such as enhancers, silencers and promoters that form the basis of complex multicellularity. Diverse vertebrate body plans not only share considerable phenotypic similarities but also cell types, the genes they express and, in a growing number of cases, in the function and nucleotide sequence of cdCREs. The current review will critically evaluate current methodologies to identify cdCREs and re-evaluate a place for comparative genomics amongst them. We will also explore the function of cdCREs and discuss methods of analysing their function in disease-associated physiologies and behaviours using in vivo models such as CRISPR-generated GA mouse lines. Finally, we will study the effects of epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation on cdCRE activity and examine how genetics and epigenetics can interact to alter disease susceptibility. Given that genome-wide association studies (GWAS) suggest that 95% of disease-associated genomic variation reside in the 98% of the less understood noncoding genome, the need to understand the role of conserved vertebrate cdCREs in development and health in vivo has never been more pressing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.