Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40614041›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Topology Augmented with Geometry in the Assembly of Structural Databases: Kagome Intermetallics.

Nataliya L Gulay, Dongsheng Wen, Joshua E Griffiths, Judith Clymo, Luke M Daniels, Jonathan Alaria, Matthew S Dyer, John B Claridge, Matthew J Rosseinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nataliya L GulayDepartment of Chemistry, Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, 51 Oxford Street, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8005-4855
Dongsheng WenDepartment of Chemistry, Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, 51 Oxford Street, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-0231
Joshua E GriffithsDepartment of Chemistry, Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, 51 Oxford Street, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2549-4491
Judith ClymoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
Luke M DanielsDepartment of Chemistry, Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, 51 Oxford Street, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-6125
Jonathan AlariaDepartment of Physics, The Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZE, UK.
Matthew S DyerDepartment of Chemistry, Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, 51 Oxford Street, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4923-3003
John B ClaridgeDepartment of Chemistry, Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, 51 Oxford Street, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-6714
Matthew J RosseinskyDepartment of Chemistry, Materials Innovation Factory, University of Liverpool, 51 Oxford Street, Liverpool, L7 3NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-2483

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V026887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creation of well-curated databases tailored to specific structural motifs can underpin and drive materials discovery, as the properties of materials are governed by composition and structure. The role of such motifs in directing the intricate interplay between structure and properties is exemplified by intermetallic compounds with structures that contain kagome layers that exhibit a variety of exotic physical states. Two prevailing approaches have previously been applied to identify such materials: evaluation of structural topology or geometry assessment, however, both present limitations if deployed individually. We augment topological screening with geometrical filtering to allow versatile control over the identification of kagome layers. Applying this approach with minimal further constraints labels over 9000 kagome-containing intermetallics which are assigned to four structural classes, revealing connections between symmetry, composition, direct space structure, and flatband electronic structures in reciprocal space. A machine learning model is used to predict new element combinations that favour the formation of kagome layers. Several highly-ranked phase fields correspond to known kagome-containing materials that were absent from the training dataset, demonstrating that the workflow can identify chemistries affording kagome layers. This motivates the extension of the approach beyond kagome to other property-conferring motifs, such as honeycomb, square planar or triangular plane nets.

Indexed as

databaseintermetallic phaseskagomemachine learningstructural nets

Identifiers

PMID40614041
PMCPMC12463092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.