Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40614034›Full record

Observational studyUpdates in surgery2025

A SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) observational prospective multicenter study on lymphadenectomy during right hemicolectomy: Should anatomical variability of the right colic artery influence the surgical strategy?-CoDIG 2 database (ColonDx Italian Group).

G Anania, A Campagnaro, G Resta, S Pedon, G Silecchia, D Cuccurullo, J Randolph, A De Troia, M Chiozza, S Marino and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

G AnaniaDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy.
A CampagnaroDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy. cmplrt@unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-7657
G RestaDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy.
S PedonDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy.
G SilecchiaDepartment of Scienze Medico Chirurgiche E Medicina Traslazionale, University of Roma S. Andrea University Hospital, Rome, RM, Italy.
D CuccurulloDivision of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery Unit, A.O.R.N. dei Colli Monaldi Hospital, Naples, NA, Italy.
J RandolphGeorgia Baptist College of Nursing, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
A De TroiaDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy.
M ChiozzaChirurgia Generale ed Endoscopica Digestiva, Ospedale Regina Montis Regalis, Mondovì, Cuneo, CN, Italy.
S MarinoDepartment of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, FE, Italy.
R CirocchiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazza Università 1, 06123, Perugia, PG, Italy.
SICE CoDIG (ColonDx Italian Group)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colon cancer is a worldwide common disease in both gender. Surgery is the best option for the treatment of advanced colon cancer without distant metasisis, but some aspects are still debated, such as the extent of lymphadenectomy. In Japanese guidelines the gold standard was D3 dissection to remove the central lymphonodes (203,213,223), but in 2009 Hoenberger et al. introduced the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) in which surgical dissection should follow the embryological planes in order to remove mesentery entirely. This way to prevent leakege of cancer cells and collect more lymphonodes. However, it is not possibile to verify that CME has improved onclogical survival, so our tudy shows how lymphadenectomy is currently performed in major italian centers against an unclear indication on the type of lymphadenectomy that should be performed during right hemicolectomy (RH). CoDIG2 is observational multicenter national study that involves 76 italian general surgery ward highly specialized in colorectal surgery. Each centers was asked not to modify their traditional surgical and clinical practice. Exclusion criteria were: aged < 18 years old, emergency surgery, laparotomic RH, ASA > IV and pregnant women. The aim of study was comparing the risk of postoperative complicationd during RH related to lymphadenectomy performed and the differences between CoDIG 1 study coducted 4 years ago. 788 patients was enrolled. The most used surgical technique was laparoscopic (82.1%) with intracorporeal (73.4%) side-to-side (98.7%) isoperistaltic (96.0%) anastomosis. Comparison between CoDIG1 and CoDIG2 shows a stable trend in surgical technique and complications, with the exception of the robotic approach which has been increasing in recent years (7.7% vs 12.3%). About lymphadenectomy the integrity of mesocolic sail has been in 88.3% of cases and the average lymph nodes harvest was 23, more frequently collected along colic vessels. Instead, sampling of lymph nodes at the origin of the colic vessels was more difficult and associated with more complications, even if the robotic surgery was most used. This analysis show a promising trend regarding how lymphadenectomy is performed in Italy to achieve the oncological outcomes in the RH, even if the technique to achieve a higher lymph nodes count has not been standardized yet.

Indexed as

ArteriesColectomyColonColonic NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesCoDIG2D3 lymphadenectomyJapanese classificationLaparoscopyRight colectomyRight colic arteryRight colon cancer lymphadenectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.