ArticleInfection2025
Current trends on antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation: a study from ESCMID-EFISG, ESCMID-ESGICH, SITA, and SEIMC-GESITRA-IC.
Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesGuideline
- Pathogen-specific epidemiology and clinical trajectories of fungal infections after kidney transplantation: a prospective multicenter cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Early Tacrolimus C0/D Ratio and Subsequent Proven Invasive Fungal Disease After Liver Transplantation with Routine Early Echinocandin Prophylaxis.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Isavuconazole as Salvage Therapy for Invasive Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Case Series.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyArticle
- An Update on Invasive Fungal Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInvasive fungal diseases (IFD) present serious risks to solid organ transplant recipients, particularly in the first 180 days post-transplant. Existing European and US guidelines offer limited evidence, prompting a shift away from universal prophylaxis due to adverse effects, drug-interactions, and costs. This study investigates antifungal prophylaxis practices in transplant centers to guide IFD management.
methodsFrom May 2023 to May 2024, tertiary care institutions completed an online survey on antifungal prophylaxis post-transplant. Data included transplant volumes, IFD incidence by pathogen, and prophylactic strategies.
resultsResponses from 64 centers in 32 countries, mainly in Europe, highlighted kidney and liver as the most common transplants. Prophylaxis was universal in lung transplants and common in liver, bowel, and heart transplants, often triggered by reintervention or Candida spp. colonization. Preferred agents included liposomal amphotericin B and fluconazole.
conclusionsThis global survey reveals substantial variation in antifungal prophylaxis practices among solid organ transplant centers, driven by a lack of standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Our findings underscore the urgent need for harmonized recommendations that reflect evolving fungal epidemiology, improved diagnostics, and new antifungal agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.