SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Current status of single port robotic-assisted reconstructive urology: a systematic review, meta-analysis and structured summary of the available literature.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy in adults: a systematic review and pooled analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Development and validation of objective performance metrics for robot-assisted basic surgical skills in a simulated anastomosis task using a single-port robotic system.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- From buccal mucosa to appendix: a bibliometric and evidence-maturity analysis of autologous tissue-based robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Single-port EDGE SP1000 versus multi-port Da Vinci Xi robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparative analysis of technique and perioperative outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Single-port robotic ileal ureter reconstruction: feasibility, technique, and early outcomes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Global research trends in robot-assisted urethral reconstruction for urethral stricture disease: a visualized bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Single-port robot-assisted ureterolysis for retroperitoneal fibrosis: A less invasive path to functional recovery.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Global research trends and hotspots in single-port robotic surgery in urology: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Europe: Where Do We Stand? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comment on: " Comparative outcomes of multi-port versus single-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy with same-day discharge: impact of surgical approach".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Single Port Robotic Extraperitoneal Distal Ureterectomy and Ureteral Reimplantation via Lower Anterior Approach.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single Port (SP) surgery is the most relevant surgical innovation of the past six years. Few data are available on the advantages and disadvantages of SP Robotic-Assisted reconstructive urology. In the present systematic review, we summarize the results of available literature exploring the feasibility of SP reconstructive urological procedures and comparing the SP and Multi Port (MP) approaches. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library Databases were systematically searched for articles evaluating outcomes of SP robotic-assisted pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation, Boari Flap, fistula repair, bladder diverticulectomy and vaginoplasty. After meticulous study selection, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of SP and MP robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (SP-RP and MP-RP). Regarding ureteric reimplantation, Boari Flap, bladder diverticulectomy, fistula repair and vaginoplasty, we underwent a structured narrative synthesis, since meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity or insufficient study numbers. The meta-analysis included a total of six retrospective cohort studies and 202 patients. SP-RP demonstrated significantly lower Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) (SMD - 0.45, 95%CI - 0.80 to - 0.09, p = 0.01, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.